Religious Assurance that God Hates Sex (How Christianity & Early Feminism Messed Up Sex & Marriage)

In our day and age, where topics concerning sex are frequently talked about and seen everywhere, it is hard to believe that there was a time in which, under Catholic ideology in the 4th century, and then becoming doctrine & dogma in the Middle Ages, dictated that sex between married couples was ONLY to be for the purpose of procreation.

Pleasure and sex – or having sex for pure pleasure and bonding in marriage – was prohibited, especially for wives, who “were admonished to avoid enjoying themselves; it was sufficient to welcome one’s husband as a passive recipient, but to share his ardor was expressly forbidden.”* 

Thank goodness today this is not something either the Catholic church deliberately teaches, or the Protestant denominations; however, this religious attitude and background surrounding sex often does still impact many Christ followers – often to the detriment of their well-being or the demise of their marriage relationship.  Many Catholic “good girls” find it hard to enjoy sex in marriage, and many Catholic men find it hard to view their wife as a sexual being.

There is the Madonna – Whore complex, where once married, a Catholic man often finds it hard to desire his angelic, pure wife (who he assumes doesn’t like sex – or who he thinks sex wouldn’t “feel good” to), over a woman who is sinful and promiscuous.  He has problems lusting after the promiscuous woman because in his mind, only a woman like her could enjoy or want sex, which in turn, gives him insurmountable feelings of guilt.

Even in marriage, unless he has a strong biblical (not Catholic) view on sex in marriage, he might be plagued with addiction to porn, cybersex, or prostitutes.  This is not what God wanted.

Again, sexuality and sexiness is equated with promiscuity and sinfulness in the mind of many Catholics even today.  But where did it come from?  How did such a perverse view of biblical, wonderful, mutually pleasurable sex get so messed up in Christianity?  Surely it didn’t come from King Solomon’s take on sexual bliss in marriage (ie. the whole book of Song of Solomon), or even from the European Jewish wedding vows in the Middle Ages which openly alluded to sex between the two lovers.*

Once the stigma was placed on sex in marriage for Catholicism, many men and women felt licensed to leave their spouses and often times children in order to pursue a religious life of celibacy and devotion to God.  Saints Jerome and Augustine brought forth the idea that “marriage, at best, was a necessary evil,” and that sex itself – even if it was good for procreation, made one less holy because it came from the flesh.  This caused many families to be disrupted and broken up, many marriages to experience decades of turmoil, all due to this religious assurance that marriage and sex were a necessary evil.

One woman’s personal story tells of how this perverse religious view of sex unraveled not only her marriage, but also her mind and sanity.  Margery Kempe, born in 1373, married at age 20, experienced a supposed form of post partum psychosis after the birth of her first child (the first of 14 children!), and recovered after a vision of Christ.  She writes of herself in her autobiography (in 3rd person):

And after this time she never had any desire to have sexual intercourse with her husband, for paying the debt of matrimony was so abominable to her that she would rather, she thought, have eaten and drunk the ooze and muck in the gutter than consent to intercourse, except out of obedience.

And so she said to her husband, “I may not deny you my body, but all the love and affection of my heart is withdrawn from all earthly creatures and set on God alone.”  But he would have his will with her, and she obeyed with much weeping and sorrowing….  And often this creature advised her husband to live chaste and said that they had often (she well knew) displeased God by their inordinate love, and the great delight each of them had in using the other’s body, and now it would be a good thing if by mutual consent they punished and chastised themselves by abstaining from the lust of their bodies.

Its amazing to hear her voice come through so clearly on this topic… the “debt of matrimony” being so “abominable,” … her hating sex and feeling so much guilt over their marriage bed to the point of rather engaging in something as disgusting as eating and drinking from the gutter!  Its incredibly hard to imagine that such a religious stigma against married sex ever existed, but it offers an explanation as to why many religious people (Catholic or not) have unconscious or deeply buried negative feelings surrounding the acceptance sex being “wonderful” and God-given for pleasure.

Its also very important to note the affect of her guilt and assurance that God hated sexual pleasure on her marriage to her husband.  She put him in the ridiculous position of desiring to have a healthy, sexual marriage with his wife, while causing her to weep and sorrow over their engagement in sex!

The only other option for him was to become a celibate husband, sexually frustrated and missing a deep part of the most bonding event in a marriage.

The Catholic Church deliberately stepped between the ability of a husband and wife to “become one” with each other, putting a stumbling block in the way of their marriage.

How did their story end?  What became of their marriage or sex life?

After some time, her husband, when asked about the subject, felt “that he was made so afraid when he would have touched her, that he dared do no more.”  Her religious assurance that God hated sex, and her weeping and acting like a martyr during intercourse finally succeeded in her getting her way.  Eventually, she persuaded her husband to allow her to take an official vow of chastity, and to travel on pilgrimages to Israel, Italy, and Spain.*  They parted on good terms, with her husband encouraging her to give her body as freely to God as she had given it to him.

Her story was not at all unique for this time period – hers is merely one of the only ones of which we have personal insight into due to her leaving behind her autobiography.  Many holy women were mothers and wives who had chosen to abandon their children & spouses, the church didn’t look down on this as being a neglectful and bad wife or mother, but encouraged by making marriage into some kind of unbiblical “necessary evil.”

Its important to note that Margery Kempe gives hardly any mention to her children in her autobiography.  She was primarily concerned (her entire life) with her own purity, chastity, and like a classic martyr or victim, she was mostly concerned with her own perceived hardship in life – that of merely being a wife and mother.

This same preoccupation with self and one’s own hardships (and total dismissal of one’s responsibilities or empathy for those who depended on her) is something that would surprisingly turn up centuries later in the minds of early feminists who also left their husbands and children in order to pursue a life centered on themselves.

The similarities between these medieval religious women who rejected the biblical model of wife and motherhood, and the feminists of the 1800’s through to today who likewise reject the biblical model of wife and motherhood, is intriguing and gives us more knowledge as to what affects a marriage or the role of a woman in her society.

 

*Quotes, etc. from A History of the Wife by Marilyn Yalom, 2002

 

 

 

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Religious Assurance that God Hates Sex (How Christianity & Early Feminism Messed Up Sex & Marriage)

  1. So much insight. You really are nailing this topic. Religion has done so much to damage men and women’s views on healthy sexuality. Its a sad day when unbelievers have healthier attitudes. I should note that religious girls and heathen girls are about as promiscuous. Women have used sex as a weapon as currency for millennia. However in marriage this SHOULD not be so. Couple that with religious induced shame and Americas puritanical (shame) view on sex and we see what we have today with women either misusing sex by being sluts or feeling shame when they have sex within marriage. Maybe one day i will tel you in private how my ex wife’s views on sex changed for the worst after she started attending church.

  2. That was interesting. I was raised to wait for marriage to have sex and when I did get married actually felt a little guilty. I was not a Christian at that point.

    I look up ‘nasty’ subjects on the internet s to see what the ‘expert’s’ say.

    Once we were the Adults at a Christian Single Camp weekend. My wife and I were asked to lead a discussion with the guys and gals in separate groups.

    I had all the guys–about 30. The first question I got was from a Baptist Bible College coach and maybe a professor. With my luck the first question (apologize as not the subject of your post) was, ‘Is masterbation a sin?’ Thank God that I had read Christian books that covered this subject. There were split evenly. I replied to the question, ‘First, every one here masterbates.’ Two guys in the back said they never did.

    So sex is still a tough subject for churhes.

  3. Pingback: Religious Assurance that God Hates Sex (How Christianity & Early Feminism Messed Up Sex & Marriage) | Christians Anonymous

  4. It it my understanding that ovulation is affected by numerous factors, specifically, moon phases, and nutrition. Primitive peoples “untouched by the foods of modern commerce” (Weston A. Price, DDS) had more ovulation regularity and were therefore able to effectively space apart reproduction (up to six years–for maximum benefit to the progeny who were therefore not subject to nutritional scarcity prenatally as well as postpartum). Agricultural slavery and the demands of militarism effectively disrupt the rhythm–not just in terms of ovulation but also allowed for faster weaning (porridge) which eliminates the benefit of reduced fertility during nursing. This is fine and dandy if one’s objective is endless growth–not so fine for the health of the genome and the greater ecosystem.

    Hunter gatherers, on the other hand, did not “worship” fertility as is spouted by Christian missionaries and their associated anthropologists, but rather knew that reproduction during resource scarcity was a net loss–to the tribe, health, sustainability, mobility, etc.–but sex on the other hand was *sacred* and a tool of spiritual and intimate connection and renewal. Therefore, much of what moderns call “fertility symbols” where actually more like pornography. Meanwhile, during scarcity, females would simply fail to ovulate on the basis of less body fat such as occurs among female athletes (and anorexics) today and a nice war would eliminate some competition for resources besides.

    It would seem to me that the imperative to “be fruitful and multiply” such as to provide a constant source of agricultural slaves and soldiers is ultimately counterproductive and would “naturally” lead to delusions that “sex” is “bad”. Forced scarcity throughout the classes (and perceived differently by each economic level) has the effect of reducing the pleasure of reproductive sex and when women have *no perceived control* over their own reproducibility they are more likely to recoil from the possibility–eventually at least–miracles of “loaves and fishes” and the annihilation of targeted resource competitors in order to feed their babies notwithstanding.

    If every religion (including Scientology of course) ultimately devolves into a utopianist pyramid scheme then it would befall the faithful to renew and revise the economic values dictates with each aristocratic revolution. Some sense of mathematics with respect to the diverse interpretations of propaganda according to maturity would be paramount. Platitudes that glorify childhood, maternity, and femininity while demonizing sexuality and its effects on the female body (loss of virginity) would seem to me to be perfect recipes for stagnant dystopia. Somehow I don’t believe that a perfect omnipotent being would be that short-sighted. Megalomaniacal warmongers on the other hand can’t see past their own drive for longevity and immortality through their excessive progeny.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s